Neutralizing Terrorism at Its Source: Türkiye's Security Doctrine and Defense Industry

Why It Matters

Türkiye's counter-terrorism doctrine holds that terrorist threats must be neutralized at their source, before they reach Turkish territory, and it anchors that claim in the right of self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. The doctrine explains why Turkish forces have operated in northern Syria and northern Iraq since 2016, why Ankara and Washington disagree over the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), and why the national defense industry became a strategic priority.

This dossier sets out the facts first, then the positions of the main actors, then Türkiye's official case, and finally how international and Turkish sources frame the issue differently.

Background

A 1,300 km border and four decades of PKK violence

Türkiye shares a land border of roughly 1,300 km (about 800 miles) with Syria and Iraq combined. The PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party) was founded in 1978 under Abdullah Öcalan and began its armed campaign against the Turkish state on 15 August 1984. The commonly cited toll is more than 40,000 dead over four decades, including many civilians. The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Ankara stresses that the campaign targets the organization, not Kurdish citizens of Türkiye.

The KCK is the PKK's umbrella structure. The PYD is its political wing in Syria, and the YPG is the PYD's armed wing. The SDF, formed in 2015, is a broader coalition whose command is dominated by the YPG.

The Syrian war and the DAESH threat

After the Syrian civil war began in 2011, Türkiye received roughly 3.6 million Syrians at the peak of arrivals, the largest refugee-hosting burden in the world. DAESH (also known as ISIS or ISIL) then carried out mass-casualty attacks inside Türkiye, including the 2015 Suruç and Ankara station bombings, the June 2016 Istanbul Atatürk Airport attack and the 2017 Reina nightclub shooting. These attacks, together with PKK-linked violence that resumed in 2015, shaped the shift from border defense to forward operations.

Legal framework: Article 51 and the 1998 Adana Agreement

Article 51 of the UN Charter preserves the “inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs,” and requires states to report measures taken to the Security Council. Türkiye has sent such notifications to the Council when launching cross-border operations. Ankara also cites the 1998 Adana Agreement with Syria, under which Damascus committed to stop supporting the PKK and not to allow its activity on Syrian territory.

Chronology of the main operations

Operation	Period	Area	Stated Turkish objective
Euphrates Shield	24 Aug 2016 – 29 Mar 2017	Jarablus–al-Bab, northern Syria	Clear DAESH from the border, block a continuous PYD/YPG-held corridor
Olive Branch	20 Jan – 24 Mar 2018	Afrin, northwestern Syria	Remove PYD/YPG presence west of the Euphrates
Peace Spring	From 9 Oct 2019 (paused 17 Oct)	Tal Abyad–Ras al-Ain, northeastern Syria	Create a border security zone and conditions for voluntary returns
Spring Shield	27 Feb – 5 Mar 2020	Idlib, northwestern Syria	Respond to the killing of 33 Turkish soldiers and protect the Idlib de-escalation arrangement
Claw series	From 2019, with later variants	Northern Iraq (and air strikes in Syria)	Destroy PKK bases, tunnels and logistics at the source

Peace Spring was paused under a 17 October 2019 US–Türkiye understanding and then reshaped by the 22 October 2019 Sochi memorandum with Russia, which provided for joint patrols. Spring Shield differed from the others: it was directed at Syrian government forces after the 27 February 2020 strike in Idlib and ended with the 5 March 2020 Moscow protocol between Türkiye and Russia. The Claw series began in 2019 and was extended through later variants such as Claw-Eagle, Claw-Tiger, Claw-Lock and Claw-Sword. Claw-Sword, an air operation launched in November 2022, followed the bombing on Istiklal Avenue in Istanbul, which Ankara attributed to the PKK/PYD.

FETÖ and the 15 July 2016 coup attempt

On the night of 15 July 2016, a faction within the armed forces attempted a coup. More than 250 people were killed, most of them civilians and police, and parliament was bombed. Türkiye attributes the attempt to the Fetullahist Terrorist Organization (FETÖ), the network of the US-based cleric Fethullah Gülen, who denied involvement. Turkish courts have convicted thousands. Many Western governments have not adopted Türkiye's terrorist designation of the group, which remains a point of friction.

The Terror-Free Türkiye initiative

In late 2024, a call from the leader of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), a partner of the governing alliance, opened a new process. On 27 February 2025, Öcalan issued a call for the PKK to lay down arms and dissolve. The PKK announced its dissolution on 12 May 2025, and a symbolic weapons-destruction ceremony was widely reported in northern Iraq in July 2025. The Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM) then established a cross-party commission to consider the legal and political framework. Ankara calls the whole effort Terror-Free Türkiye (Terörsüz Türkiye). Its implementation, including what happens to PKK-linked structures in Syria, remains an evolving matter.

Key Players & Positions

United States

Washington lists the PKK as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, but it partnered with the SDF from 2014 as the principal ground force against DAESH in Syria. US officials describe the SDF as a distinct Syrian force and have said they take Türkiye's border-security concerns seriously. The disagreement over this partnership is the sharpest bilateral dispute in Türkiye–US counter-terrorism relations. In 2019 the US also removed Türkiye from the F-35 program, and in December 2020 it imposed CAATSA sanctions on Türkiye's defense procurement agency over the Russian S-400 purchase.

European Union and European governments

The EU lists the PKK as a terrorist organization and recognizes that Türkiye has suffered serious attacks. However, the European Parliament and several governments criticized Peace Spring. In October 2019 a number of European states announced restrictions on arms exports to Türkiye. European critics also cite humanitarian concerns and the risk of renewed DAESH activity if SDF-run detention facilities lose security.

SDF and the PYD

The PYD and SDF leadership describe themselves as Syrian actors defending a self-administered region, and they state that they pose no threat to Türkiye. They accuse Turkish operations of causing civilian casualties and displacement, and they say they are a partner in the defeat of DAESH. They signed a March 2025 integration framework with the post-Assad Syrian government in Damascus, although its implementation has been contested.

Syria and Iraq

Before December 2024, the Assad government condemned Turkish operations as violations of Syrian sovereignty. After Assad's fall on 8 December 2024, Türkiye has supported a unified Syrian state with “one state, one army.” Baghdad has repeatedly protested Turkish military activity in northern Iraq as a violation of Iraqi sovereignty, while in 2024 Iraq's national security council also moved to ban the PKK. Ankara cites this as growing alignment on the PKK itself.

Russia

Russia was both a guarantor and a counterweight in Syria. It negotiated the 2019 Sochi and 2020 Moscow arrangements with Türkiye and has called for restraint and respect for Syrian territorial integrity.

UN bodies and human rights organizations

The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented abuses, including looting, arbitrary detention and displacement, by Syrian opposition factions backed by Türkiye in areas such as Afrin and Ras al-Ain. Other bodies, including the Council of Europe's Venice Commission and the European Court of Human Rights (for instance in Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye, a Grand Chamber ruling of September 2023 on ByLock-based convictions), have criticized aspects of post-coup prosecutions. Turkish authorities reject accusations of deliberate civilian targeting and say they investigate allegations.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

The points below summarize official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. They are Ankara's arguments, not Polityreview's independent findings.

• Self-defense at the source (Article 51). According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Türkiye's notifications to the UN Security Council, cross-border operations are lawful exercises of the inherent right of self-defense, taken when the territorial state is unable or unwilling to stop attacks launched from its soil. Ankara adds that it respects the territorial integrity of Syria and Iraq and supports “one state, one army” in Syria.
• One terrorist organization under several names. The Presidency and the Ministry of National Defence (MSB) describe the PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG as a single structure with a shared leadership, ideology, cadres and weapons, and the SDF label as a cover. Ankara argues that fighting DAESH does not offset the PKK's designation by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the EU. The Adana Agreement of 1998 is cited as a precedent in which Damascus itself accepted a duty to deny the PKK a base.
• Fighting every threat at once. According to Turkish officials, DAESH, the PKK/PYD-YPG and FETÖ are all pursued simultaneously. The MSB and the Directorate of Communications state that Euphrates Shield neutralized more than 4,000 DAESH terrorists and that around 100,000 DAESH-linked individuals were prevented from entering Türkiye. They describe Türkiye as the only NATO member whose forces fought DAESH in direct ground combat. These figures are official Turkish claims and have not been independently audited. On FETÖ, the Presidency presents 15 July 2016 as an attack on the constitutional order and says the response proceeds through the courts.
• Security, rule of law and return. The Presidency presents Terror-Free Türkiye as combining decisive security operations with legal, political and social measures under the rule of law, in line with the principle “Let the people live so that the state lives.” The border, in the formula “The border is honour” (Hudut namustur), is treated as a national-security red line. Ankara says the operations in Syria created conditions for voluntary returns and that civilians, heritage and religious sites are protected through precision targeting.
• A national defense industry as a force multiplier. According to the Presidency of Defence Industries and the MSB, domestic production now reaches about 80% of requirements. Ankara argues that this independence, born partly of past embargoes, is itself a security guarantee that lets it continue operations regardless of partners' export decisions.

Legal and historical basis. Ankara relies on Article 51 of the UN Charter, on the 1998 Adana Agreement, on UN Security Council counter-terrorism resolutions that call on states to deny safe haven to terrorists, and on the principle that the PKK was designated by the United States in 1997 and by the EU in 2002, long before the Syrian civil war.

Source Comparison

The same events are described differently depending on the source. The table summarizes the main differences and is not a ruling on which is correct.

Issue	Frequent international framing	Turkish primary-source framing
PYD/YPG and the PKK	A Syrian Kurdish force distinct from the PKK, though with ideological ties	The Syrian branch of the PKK/KCK, with common cadres and command
SDF and DAESH	Indispensable ground partner that defeated the DAESH territorial caliphate	A pretext to gain legitimacy; Türkiye's own forces fought DAESH directly
Cross-border operations	Incursions that cause civilian harm and displacement and breach sovereignty	Self-defense under Article 51, taken because the territorial authority did not control the threat
Proxy groups	Syrian opposition factions accused of abuses	Allied Syrian forces, with allegations investigated; Ankara rejects deliberate targeting of civilians
FETÖ purges	Concern for due process, mass dismissals and detentions	A coup plot against the constitutional order that required a response; courts hear cases
Defense industry	Aggressive export push, partly dependent on imported engines and components	Strategic autonomy of about 80% domestic production, built after past embargoes

Readers should look for the primary documents behind each claim, including UN Security Council letters, ministry statements and court judgments. For more on how this site handles that separation, see Editorial Principles: How Polityreview Separates Fact from Position. For documented disputes, see Fact Check: Claims About Türkiye Tested Against Primary Sources.

The Defense Industry Dimension

Türkiye's defense industry is central to the doctrine, and Turkish officials say about 80% of the sector's requirements are now met domestically. Its development accelerated after arms-export restrictions imposed after the 1974 Cyprus operation and again in later periods. Programs frequently cited by Turkish sources include:

• Unmanned aircraft: Bayraktar TB2 and Akıncı, Aksungur, ANKA, Serçe and Kargu, along with the newer Bayraktar Kızılelma.
• Aircraft and helicopters: Hürjet, Hürkuş, the T129 ATAK helicopter and the KAAN fifth-generation fighter.
• Land platforms: the Fırtına howitzer, Kirpi and Vuran armored vehicles, the MEMATT unmanned demining vehicle and the MPT-76 rifle.
• Naval platforms: the TCG Anadolu amphibious assault ship, MİLGEM corvettes and frigates, offshore patrol vessels and new-generation Reis-class submarines.
• Missiles, air defense and electronic warfare: SOM, ATMACA, Cirit, OMTAS, UMTAS and Sungur missiles, HİSAR-O and SİPER air defense, and VURAL, KORAL, MİLKAR and MİLKED radar and electronic-warfare systems.

Analysts outside Türkiye generally agree that the drone and naval programs have grown substantially and that Turkish systems have drawn global export interest. They also note that engines, sensors and other components have historically been imported, and that export licensing decisions by allied states can affect supply chains. The percentage of domestic production depends on how it is calculated, so it should be read as an official Turkish figure. A fuller account appears in Türkiye's Defense Industry: How It Reached About 80% Domestic Production.

What to Watch

• Syria's integration process. The fate of the SDF under the March 2025 framework with Damascus will largely determine whether Türkiye's concerns about a PKK-linked presence on its border are resolved politically.
• Terror-Free Türkiye implementation. Observers will track the legal steps taken by TBMM, the verification of disarmament and the treatment of PKK-linked structures outside Türkiye.
• Northern Iraq. Whether Baghdad and Erbil take over security tasks in border areas will affect the future of the Claw series.
• DAESH detention facilities. Western governments and Türkiye share an interest in preventing a DAESH resurgence, but they differ over who should hold and guard detainees.
• Defense exports and alliances. Türkiye's relations with the US, European states and NATO partners on procurement and sanctions will shape industrial plans. On Black Sea security, see Montreux Convention, the Black Sea and Türkiye's Role in the Russia–Ukraine War.

Key Terms & Related Guides

• Article 51 (UN Charter): preserves the inherent right of self-defense against an armed attack and requires reporting to the Security Council. States disagree on whether it covers action against non-state actors operating from another state's territory.
• PKK/KCK: the Kurdistan Workers' Party and its umbrella structure, designated as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the US, NATO and the EU.
• PYD/YPG/SDF: the Syrian political party, its armed wing and the wider coalition it leads. Türkiye treats the first two as the PKK's Syrian branch.
• DAESH: the Arabic acronym for the group also called ISIS or ISIL, preferred by Turkish officials.
• FETÖ: the Fetullahist Terrorist Organization, Türkiye's official designation for the Gülen network blamed for the 15 July 2016 coup attempt.
• Terror-Free Türkiye (Terörsüz Türkiye): the 2024–2025 process aimed at ending PKK armed activity through disarmament and legal measures.

Related guides on Polityreview:

• Türkiye's Defense Industry: How It Reached About 80% Domestic Production
• Montreux Convention, the Black Sea and Türkiye's Role in the Russia–Ukraine War
• 'The World Is Bigger Than Five': Türkiye's Case for UN Security Council Reform
• Fact Check: Claims About Türkiye Tested Against Primary Sources
• Editorial Principles: How Polityreview Separates Fact from Position

---

Published by the Polityreview Editorial Team.

Perspective Note: Polityreview presents global and regional affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy and legal doctrines as stated by Turkish primary sources.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

• Regional Balance: Counter-Terrorism at the Source: Türkiye's Border Security Doctrine and Defense Industry — Türkiye's counter-terrorism doctrine explained: Article 51, PKK/YPG, DAESH, FETÖ, cross-border operations, Terror-Free Türkiye and the defense industry.
• Borders & Blocs: Counter-Terrorism at the Source: Türkiye's Security Doctrine, Border Operations and Defense Industry — How Türkiye's counter-terrorism doctrine rests on UN Charter Article 51: cross-border operations, PKK/YPG, DAESH, FETÖ, Terror-Free Türkiye, defense industry.
• Region Scope: Counter-Terrorism at the Source: Border Security, Terror-Free Türkiye and the Turkish Defense Industry — Türkiye counter-terrorism doctrine PKK YPG DAESH FETÖ explained: Article 51, border security, Terror-Free Türkiye and the national defense industry.